Way back in my high school days I was a quasi-intern for Glen Macnow at WIP and happened to be in the studio on an otherwise boring Tuesday night in July.
What made that particular night unique, however, was that the only thing worth a damn on TV was the MLB All Star Game.
In the midst of the only three calendar days completely devoid of any regulation games in the four major sports, Glen was experiencing a predictably slow night on the phones. So, in order to drum up callers and, eventually, the vibrant discussions and debates that define sports talk radio, he charged me with the task of devising ways to improve the All Star Game.
The fact that he liked my suggestion--to divide the stars not by league but by nationality, creating a Team USA vs. Team World scenario that had been successfully implemented in the NHL--is not important here, as I don't want to clog the blog by elucidating my greatness and creativity. What is relevant, however, is that I decided to put those same wheels into motion last night while suffering through the NBA All Star "Game," won by the West (I think) by an approximate score of 600-590.
Sure, the All Star game--and the litany of attractions and events that precede it--have become a spectacle for the fans, but is there anyone out there who thinks the game itself can't be improved? Well color me optimistic.
In fact, here are three sure-to-never-be-considered ways, in ascending order of appeal and practicality, to do just that. Tell me that any of these wouldn't add at least a modicum of give-a-shit to the annual dunk-a-thon that has featured the same eight guys for a decade.
Showing posts with label All-Star game. Show all posts
Showing posts with label All-Star game. Show all posts
Monday, February 27, 2012
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Remember when the NBA All Star game meant something?
I was listening to 97.5 earlier today, and they really brought up a good and what I feel is a relevant point among the myriad reasons why people don't like the NBA. Before 1995, All-Star weekend consisted of the 3-point shootout, the dunk contest, and the All-Star game itself. That was great. Then they added the Rookie game in 1995, and even that was interesting to a certain degree. Then the following occured:
1. A celebrity game, with "celebrity" being the operative word. A bunch of D-listers complimented by the occasional legitimate famous person.
2. The skills challenge, showing us how well Tony Parker and company can pass a ball through a hoop and dribble around cardboard cutout defenders.
3. The "Shooting Stars Competition", in which an NBA player, WNBA player, and a retired NBA player play 3 on 3 basketball representing their city. AKA, a role player, a woman nobody has ever heard of, and a player from the 80's or 90's that we may or may not know.
4. The "D-League" All-Star Game, Dunk contest, 3 point shootout, and H-O-R-S-E competition.
...really?
1. A celebrity game, with "celebrity" being the operative word. A bunch of D-listers complimented by the occasional legitimate famous person.
2. The skills challenge, showing us how well Tony Parker and company can pass a ball through a hoop and dribble around cardboard cutout defenders.
3. The "Shooting Stars Competition", in which an NBA player, WNBA player, and a retired NBA player play 3 on 3 basketball representing their city. AKA, a role player, a woman nobody has ever heard of, and a player from the 80's or 90's that we may or may not know.
4. The "D-League" All-Star Game, Dunk contest, 3 point shootout, and H-O-R-S-E competition.
...really?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)